Caitlin Clark was eye-poked, shoved to the ground, and hit with a technical foul for being the victim in a chaotic WNBA game that officials completely lost control of, yet she still led her team to victory despite the targeting.

At a Glance

• Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark was poked in the eye by Connecticut’s Jacy Sheldon, then shoved to the ground by Marina Mabrey in a physical Commissioner’s Cup semifinal
• Clark was bizarrely given a technical foul after being the victim of the eye poke, highlighting questionable officiating
• The game featured multiple altercations, resulting in three ejections in the final minute
• Despite the physical targeting, Clark and the Fever prevailed 88-71 to advance to the Commissioner’s Cup championship

WNBA Officials Let Game Spiral Out of Control

The Indiana Fever defeated the Connecticut Sun 88-71 on Tuesday to advance to the Commissioner’s Cup championship, but the scoreboard only tells half the story. What should have been a celebration of women’s basketball instead devolved into something resembling a WWE cage match, with rookie phenom Caitlin Clark serving as the primary target. The officiating crew stood by as tensions escalated throughout the game, allowing physical play to cross the line repeatedly until the situation finally boiled over in the third quarter.

The brewing animosity between Clark and Sun guard Jacy Sheldon reached its peak when Sheldon deliberately poked Clark in the eye during the third quarter. Adding insult to injury – literally – Clark was inexplicably assessed a technical foul after reacting to being poked in the face. When the dust settled, officials upgraded Sheldon’s foul to a flagrant 1, but by then, the message was clear: open season had been declared on the WNBA’s most marketable star, and the refs weren’t interested in protecting her.

Clark Targeted by Multiple Players

The situation escalated when Connecticut’s Marina Mabrey decided to add her name to the list of Clark’s attackers, shoving the rookie star to the ground in what can only be described as an act of pure frustration. Officials finally took notice, issuing Mabrey a technical foul, but the damage was done. The league that has been more than happy to ride Clark’s popularity and record-breaking attendance to financial prosperity apparently has no interest in ensuring her safety on the court.

“I think that it was pretty obvious that stuff was brewing. When the officials don’t get control of the ballgame, when they allow that stuff to happen.”

Fever head coach Stephanie White didn’t mince words about the officials’ incompetence, noting there wasn’t even an explanation given for the technical foul against Clark. The blatant double standard is impossible to ignore – imagine LeBron James getting poked in the eye, then being assessed a technical foul for his trouble. The basketball world would erupt in outrage, yet when it happens to Clark, the WNBA’s response appears to be a collective shrug.

Game Ends in Complete Chaos

The officials’ failure to establish control early allowed tensions to simmer until they exploded in the final minute. Indiana’s Sophie Cunningham committed a hard foul on Sheldon, triggering another skirmish that resulted in ejections for Cunningham, Sheldon, and Connecticut’s Lindsay Allen. By then, the game had completely devolved from a basketball contest into something resembling a street fight with occasional shooting.

“They’ve got to get control of it, and they’ve got to be better. They’ve got to be better.”

The irony is almost too perfect – the WNBA has never been more popular, largely thanks to Clark’s arrival, yet the league seems incapable of protecting its golden goose. Instead of celebrating Clark’s talent and the excitement she brings to women’s basketball, we’re left discussing eye pokes and shoving matches. This isn’t just bad officiating; it’s a fundamental failure by the WNBA to recognize what’s at stake. If the league wants to capitalize on its newfound popularity, ensuring its star players aren’t being physically targeted would be a good place to start.

​