A new biography on Prince Andrew has reignited scrutiny of his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that the late financier exploited the royal’s vulnerabilities for geopolitical and personal advantage.

At a Glance

• Book claims Epstein passed intel on Prince Andrew to foreign agencies
• Andrew reportedly introduced Epstein to high-level UK contacts
• Epstein allegedly called Andrew a “serial sex addict”
• Alleged encounters said to occur during official trips abroad
• The royal household has not commented on the new allegations

Exploitation and Access

The biography, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York by Andrew Lownie, offers the most detailed account yet of Prince Andrew’s association with Jeffrey Epstein. Drawing on court records, intelligence contacts, and unnamed sources, the book alleges that Epstein gained social and political leverage by exploiting Andrew’s social insecurity and financial desperation.
Epstein is said to have used Andrew’s name to elevate his global profile and insinuate himself into elite British and European networks. The biography also claims Epstein may have relayed sensitive or compromising information about Andrew to intelligence agencies, including Mossad and Libyan services.

Watch now: Controversial Book Brings Epstein and Royal’s Friendship Back Into Spotlight

Additionally, the book presents claims that Andrew participated in orchestrated liaisons involving multiple women during overseas diplomatic travel. Epstein, in a reportedly documented comment, referred to Andrew as “pussy-obsessed” and a habitual participant in group encounters arranged through elite social circles.

Legal Silence, Public Pressure

Despite the biography’s detailed accusations, Prince Andrew has not publicly responded. The royal household has declined comment, and no formal legal action has been taken against the book’s publication. Analysts suggest the lack of rebuttal may be strategic, given the potential for greater media amplification or litigation exposure.

While many of the claims cannot be independently verified, they build upon existing public knowledge of Andrew’s connection to Epstein—including the infamous photo with Virginia Giuffre, which remains central to previous legal settlements.

Experts warn that the new disclosures could complicate the monarchy’s image rehabilitation efforts, particularly following the legal resolution of Andrew’s civil lawsuit in 2022. British public opinion remains divided on the prince’s future role, and recent polling shows that a majority of UK respondents oppose any return to formal royal duties.

Fallout and Forward Motion

As with prior Epstein-linked disclosures, these revelations have sparked broader discussions about elite impunity and institutional transparency. Legal experts note that if foreign intelligence agencies possess evidence corroborating these claims, it could lead to renewed parliamentary inquiries or pressure on the UK government to reopen aspects of past investigations.

The biography has become a bestseller in the UK within its first week of publication, with several watchdog groups urging media outlets and legislators to address its implications beyond tabloid exposure. Whether this results in official action or remains confined to public discourse remains to be seen.

Sources

The Guardian
News.com.au
The Daily Beast