EU Seeks Formal Agreement for Afghan Migrant Deportations

On October 18, 2025, a coalition of 20 European nations, including 19 European Union members and Norway, formally requested a deportation agreement with Afghanistan. The initiative aims to facilitate both voluntary and forced returns of illegal Afghan migrants, including individuals deemed threats to public safety.

Story Highlights

  • A joint letter was sent to the European Commission by 20 European nations, advocating for a formal deportation agreement with Afghanistan.
  • The proposal targets illegal migrants and individuals posing public safety risks.
  • Since the Taliban’s takeover in 2021, European countries have faced obstacles in deporting Afghan nationals, including those convicted of offenses.
  • The initiative reflects a growing focus among European leaders on security and migration control.
  • Negotiations with the Taliban regime, despite its human rights record, are being considered as a pragmatic approach to address the deportation stalemate.

Europe’s Deportation Stalemate: Addressing Public Safety Concerns

The joint letter, spearheaded by Belgium’s Minister for Asylum and Migration, Anneleen Van Bossuyt, highlights concerns regarding the inability to deport Afghan nationals since the 2021 Taliban takeover. This situation has resulted in thousands of individuals with deportation orders remaining in Europe due to legal and diplomatic challenges.

Between 2021 and 2025, deportations to Afghanistan significantly decreased. In 2024, only 435 of over 22,000 Afghans with deportation orders in Europe were returned. This disparity has led to increased discussions about the enforcement of immigration laws and the impact on local communities. The current effort indicates a shift towards prioritizing public order and enforcement.

Negotiating with the Taliban: A Pragmatic Approach to Deportations

A notable aspect of this initiative is the willingness of a significant European bloc to engage in negotiations with the Taliban regime to secure deportation agreements. This approach underscores a pragmatic shift, with some European leaders prioritizing domestic safety. Germany’s interior ministry, for example, facilitated a deportation flight to Afghanistan in July 2025 through Qatari mediation. The coordinated letter calls for an EU-wide return agreement, an enhanced role for the border agency Frontex, and the implementation of reintegration programs to overcome existing diplomatic and legal challenges.

This willingness to engage with the Taliban reflects evolving perspectives on migration policies and the recognition of public safety concerns associated with unchecked migration. While critics express concerns about potentially legitimizing the Taliban, proponents argue that public safety and the integrity of immigration laws are paramount. The European Court of Human Rights’ precedents regarding asylum seekers remain a factor in these discussions. The scale and urgency of this effort mark a significant development in Europe’s migration debate.

International Implications and Policy Discussions

The developments in European migration policy are being observed internationally. Discussions in the United States, particularly regarding immigration policies and border security, draw parallels with the European experience. Conservative voices in the U.S. advocate for stricter immigration enforcement and a focus on national security.

Recent policy adjustments in the U.S. include deportation targets and increased cooperation with local law enforcement. The European situation is viewed by some as an illustration of the potential consequences when migration policies face challenges in enforcement and public confidence in institutions is affected. The ongoing efforts in Europe are expected to influence future migration policy discussions in Western nations.

Outlook: Shaping Future Migration Policies

The outcome of Europe’s current deportation initiative is anticipated to influence future migration policies across Western countries. A successful implementation could signify a renewed emphasis on national governments’ authority to enforce borders and ensure citizen safety. Conversely, if the initiative faces obstacles from legal challenges, bureaucratic inertia, or diplomatic stalemates, it could contribute to further social unrest and a decline in institutional confidence in Europe. For those advocating for stricter border controls and national sovereignty, the European experience serves as a case study in the importance of robust enforcement and the preservation of constitutional values.

Watch the report: Leaked EU Letter EXPOSED: Europe’s Secret Plan to Deport Afghans Revealed!

Sources:

Nineteen EU countries and Norway demand measures to return Afghans either voluntarily or forcibly
Belgium wins backing from 19 EU states for Afghan deportations
Belgium rallies EU support to greenlight Afghans deportations
20 European States Issued a Demand to Afghanistan
20 countries push for more deportations to Afghanistan
Twenty EU countries and Norway demand measures to return Afghans either voluntarily or forcibly
EU countries want to deport more Afghans
Push to deport failed Afghan asylum seekers from Europe could benefit Taliban

27.Oct
JPMorgan Chase Seeks to Cease The $115M Payment

JPMorgan Chase is currently engaged in a legal dispute to discontinue its obligation to fund approximately $115 million in legal...

26.Oct
California DUI Case Involving Undocumented Trucker

A recent traffic incident in California has drawn national attention, involving an undocumented commercial truck driver charged with driving under...

26.Oct
Special Counsel Jack Smith Offers Public Testimony

Special Counsel Jack Smith has offered to testify publicly before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. This initiative aims to...

Please leave your comment below!

*