An Indiana attorney named Mark Steven Zuckerberg is suing Meta after repeated Facebook suspensions crippled his business and triggered a fight over algorithmic overreach.

At a Glance

• Indiana lawyer Mark Zuckerberg filed suit against Meta in September 2025.
• His Facebook accounts were suspended four times since 2010 for “impersonation.”
• Losses exceed $11,000 in advertising and client outreach.
• Meta reinstated his account but has not promised systemic reforms.

Automated Moderation and the Legal Fight

The lawsuit filed in Marion Superior Court pits Indianapolis bankruptcy attorney Mark Steven Zuckerberg against Meta Platforms, Inc. The conflict stems from Meta’s repeated suspensions of his accounts for alleged impersonation of the company’s CEO, Mark Elliot Zuckerberg. Despite repeatedly submitting government identification and business documents, Zuckerberg’s personal and professional Facebook pages were shut down multiple times over the past 15 years.

These disruptions have cost him more than $11,000 in lost advertising campaigns and client acquisition. The most recent suspension occurred in May 2025, leading to months of reduced visibility for his law practice. His lawsuit accuses Meta of negligence and breach of contract, seeking damages and an injunction to prevent further wrongful suspensions.

Watch now: Indianapolis attorney Mark Zuckerberg suing Meta over repeated Facebook suspensions

Big Tech’s Reach and Lack of Recourse

Zuckerberg’s ordeal underscores how automated moderation systems, designed to detect impersonation and fraud, can misfire with damaging consequences. Each time his account was frozen, he was forced to submit verification documents, consuming time and resources while his business visibility collapsed. With no clear path to meaningful human oversight, his appeals were handled by Meta’s automated channels, leaving him unable to secure lasting protection from further errors.

Meta eventually reinstated his account following the lawsuit and issued a brief statement admitting to error. However, the company did not commit to changes in its moderation or appeal process. The lack of systemic reform leaves other small businesses vulnerable to similar algorithmic misjudgments.

Wider Risks for Businesses and Rights

Beyond financial setbacks, the case raises constitutional and social concerns. Critics argue that Meta’s unchecked power to restrict access to digital platforms mirrors a lack of due process protections. With much of small business marketing tied to social media platforms, an account suspension can mean the sudden loss of a primary communication and advertising channel.
If successful, Zuckerberg’s lawsuit could push tech companies to incorporate stronger human oversight into their moderation systems. It could also create a precedent for individuals with high-profile names unfairly targeted by identity checks.

Economically, the case highlights how algorithmic governance compounds challenges already faced by small businesses, from inflation to regulatory costs. Socially, it intensifies debates over whether large corporations wield disproportionate influence over individual rights in the digital economy.

Sources

New York Post
Indianapolis Star
Fox59 Indianapolis