In a stunning departure from the principles of the U.S. Constitution, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) has boldly declared that the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech is not absolute. In a recent interview, Walz asserted that “there’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, especially around our democracy.”

Walz’s remarks have ignited a firestorm of criticism from conservatives and free speech advocates who view the freedom of expression as a fundamental pillar of American democracy. The governor’s stance echoes similar sentiments expressed by President Joe Biden, who has previously stated that “no right is absolute.”

The Minnesota leader’s position comes as he has championed efforts to “make it as easy as possible to vote” in his state, including policies such as automatic voter registration and the printing of ballots in multiple languages. However, Walz has also vowed to crack down on “voter intimidation,” and it was in this context that he made his controversial claims about the First Amendment.

Walz’s assertion that “misinformation” and “hate speech” are not protected by the Constitution is particularly troubling, as these terms are often used subjectively to silence opposing voices. The prosecution of individuals like Douglass Mackey, who was convicted for posting a meme about voting, serves as a cautionary tale of the dangers of such a broad interpretation of “misinformation.”

As the 2024 election season approaches, Walz’s stance on free speech is sure to be a point of contention and a cause for concern among conservative voters in Minnesota and beyond. The fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution must be vigilantly defended, lest they be eroded by those who seek to control the flow of information and ideas.