Elton John threatens legal action against UK’s Labour government over proposed AI legislation that would allow tech companies to use creative works without permission or payment.

At a Glance

• Elton John labeled the UK government’s AI copyright plans as “theft, thievery on a high scale”
• The Labour government rejected House of Lords amendments that would have required AI companies to get permission to use copyrighted works
• John called government officials “absolute losers” and expressed feeling “incredibly betrayed” by their stance
• Over 400 artists including Paul McCartney have signed a letter opposing the legislation
• The music icon warned the plan would particularly harm young artists who lack resources to fight tech giants

Music Legend Slams “Criminal” AI Legislation

Sir Elton John has launched a blistering attack on the UK’s Labour government, condemning its plans to exempt big tech companies from copyright laws for AI training. The iconic British musician didn’t mince words when describing the Data (Use and Access) Bill, which would allow artificial intelligence firms to scrape and use creative content without securing permission from artists or providing compensation. The controversial legislation represents a significant shift in copyright protection that has united artists across the industry in opposition.

John made his frustrations clear in recent statements, describing himself as “very angry” about the government’s position. He specifically targeted Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s administration for seemingly prioritizing tech industry interests over protecting creative professionals. The rock legend’s criticism comes after the House of Lords had voted to amend the bill to require AI companies to secure consent before using copyrighted material, only to see those amendments rejected by the House of Commons.

Artists including Kate Bush, Sam Fender and Damon Albarn release silent album in protest at AI copyright plans https://t.co/dyDJhsbFgX More than 1,000 artists and musicians including Kate Bush, Damon Albarn, Sam Fender and Annie Lennox have recorded a silent album in protest at…

— MundayMunday (@MundayMuse) February 25, 2025

Government Faces Mounting Artistic Opposition

The Data (Use and Access) Bill has become a flashpoint for tensions between the creative industry and technology sector. As currently written, the legislation would create a system where copyright holders must actively opt out to prevent their work from being used for AI training. Critics argue this reverses the traditional copyright approach, which requires permission before using protected works. Sir Elton is not alone in his opposition – a coalition of over 400 artists including Paul McCartney has signed a letter to the Prime Minister advocating for stronger copyright protections.

The government has defended its position, with a spokesperson claiming no changes to copyright laws would be made unless they benefit creators. However, this statement has done little to quell the growing backlash from the artistic community. Reports indicate Technology Secretary Peter Kyle’s department has held an increasing number of meetings with major tech firms since Labour’s election victory, fueling concerns about industry influence on policy decisions.

Potential Legal Challenge Looms

In a significant escalation, Sir Elton has threatened legal action if the government proceeds with its current plans. His primary concern centers on how the legislation would affect emerging artists who lack the financial resources to challenge powerful technology companies. While established performers like himself have the means to fight legal battles, John emphasized that younger artists would be particularly vulnerable under the proposed system.

The debate highlights growing tensions between advancing artificial intelligence technology and protecting intellectual property rights. Paul McCartney has separately warned that unchecked AI development could exploit artists and diminish creative output. This confrontation between the Labour government and some of Britain’s most celebrated musicians represents a crucial moment in determining how creative works will be protected in the age of artificial intelligence, with significant implications for the future of artistic compensation and control.

​