The CIA’s recent shift to emphasize Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in its promotion and hiring criteria has stirred controversy, with critics arguing the new focus could compromise the agency’s mission integrity. Internal documents and presentations reveal that DEI initiatives are now embedded in promotion panels and leadership evaluations, a move the CIA claims supports a more inclusive workplace.

During a May presentation, Jerry Laurienti, the CIA’s Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer, explained that DEI has become an essential factor in candidate evaluations. In addition to assessing mission performance, promotion panels now consider candidates’ contributions to DEI within their teams. Laurienti insisted that leaders must “demonstrate DEI on the job,” viewing it as a key component of effective leadership.

The CIA has also taken steps to ensure DEI programs endure beyond changes in administration, with internal documents indicating a desire for policies that are not “easily shaken” by political shifts. This strategy has drawn criticism from some former officials, who view it as a long-term shift toward social objectives over intelligence gathering.

Fred Fleitz, a former CIA official and national security adviser, expressed concern that the DEI agenda might lower the agency’s operational standards. Fleitz argued that prioritizing DEI over merit could hamper the CIA’s ability to field the best talent. He described this shift as part of a “social engineering” trend in government, one that he believes weakens mission focus.

The DEI strategy also includes measures to reduce barriers for underrepresented groups, aiming to foster “psychological safety” across the agency. Proponents argue that these policies create a more supportive work environment, but critics contend they may lead to distractions from the CIA’s core intelligence mission.

As DEI gains ground within the CIA, the debate over its impact on the agency’s effectiveness continues. Supporters see these initiatives as modernizing the workplace, while detractors worry that an emphasis on social priorities could undermine the CIA’s ability to carry out its national security responsibilities.