Arizona residents are set to vote on a groundbreaking immigration enforcement proposal this November, following a pivotal ruling by the state’s Supreme Court. The measure, Proposition 314, would grant local law enforcement extensive powers to address illegal border crossings, marking a significant shift in a failing state-level immigration policy.

Chief Justice Ann A. Scott Timmer dismissed challenges to the proposal, affirming its compliance with Arizona’s single-subject rule. If approved by voters, the measure would introduce sweeping changes to the state’s approach to illegal immigration and border security.

Gov. Doug Ducey (R) of Arizona expressed support for the measure, stating, “This proposal gives Arizonans a direct say in how we secure our borders. It’s a response to the ongoing crisis that Washington has failed to address.”

Key provisions of Proposition 314 include:

• Empowering state and local police to arrest illegal entrants
• Allowing judges to issue deportation orders
• Mandating E-Verify for public benefits enrollment
• Imposing strict penalties for fentanyl-related deaths

The measure draws parallels to Texas’ controversial Senate Bill 4, which faced legal challenges from the federal government. Arizona State Sen. Justine Wadsack (R) described Proposition 314 as “like the Texas bill, only stronger.”

Critics argue that the proposal oversteps state authority on immigration matters. However, supporters contend it’s a necessary step given perceived federal inaction on border security.

As Arizona prepares for this crucial vote, other states are closely watching. Oklahoma, Iowa and Louisiana have considered similar measures, signaling a potential shift in how states approach immigration enforcement.

The outcome of Arizona’s vote could have far-reaching implications, potentially reshaping the national debate on border security and the role of states in immigration policy. It also sets the stage for potential legal battles with the federal government over jurisdiction in immigration matters.