A temporary ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia has been established, offering a pause in the conflict that has continued for over three years. As negotiations unfold, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano has once again condemned NATO’s role in the war, claiming Western nations have used Ukraine as a tool against Russia.

Vigano, a vocal critic of NATO’s actions, argues that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has had little influence over the war and should not be a major figure in peace negotiations. He previously accused “deep state” forces in the U.S. and EU of escalating tensions with Russia rather than working toward a diplomatic resolution.

Scrivevo nell’Agosto 2023: «L’Ucraina agisce come testa di ariete nella proxy war della NATO contro la Federazione Russa, per cui dovremmo anzitutto smettere di considerare Zelens’kyj come un interlocutore negli eventuali accordi di pace: se non ha contato nulla nella…

— Arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò (@CarloMVigano) March 17, 2025

His stance runs counter to NATO’s official position, which maintains that Ukraine is defending itself against Russian aggression. The military alliance has continued to support Ukraine with weapons, training and intelligence.

Zelenskyy recently referred to himself as “exchangeable” in Ukraine’s push for NATO membership, a remark that has fueled speculation over the extent of Ukraine’s independence in decision-making. His government has relied heavily on the backing of Western powers to sustain its war effort.

Beyond Ukraine, Vigano has questioned why President Donald Trump is seeking peace in Ukraine while U.S. military operations continue in the Middle East. He called for a more consistent approach to foreign policy, suggesting that selective interventions only deepen instability.

Vigano also warned of worsening conditions for Christians in war-torn regions, including Syria and Gaza. He accused global powers of ignoring their suffering, arguing that Western-backed actions have contributed to their persecution.

With the ceasefire now in effect, the future of NATO’s involvement in Ukraine remains uncertain. Whether this truce leads to lasting peace or is merely a temporary halt in hostilities remains to be seen.